Relative Clauses 4 | Unit 95 | PrepMyEnglish
PrepMyEnglish
Accueil Grammar Unit 95 — Relative Clauses 4
Unit 95 · Grammar Lesson
Unité 95 · Leçon de Grammaire

Relative Clauses 4
Extra Information Clauses · Type 1 vs Type 2 · Commas · that vs which — Complete Guide
Propositions Relatives 4
Relatives d'information · Type 1 vs Type 2 · Virgules · that vs which — Guide Complet

Understand the crucial difference between defining clauses (Type 1 — no commas, can use that) and non-defining clauses (Type 2 — commas required, that forbidden).

Comprenez la différence cruciale entre les relatives restrictives (Type 1 — pas de virgules, that possible) et les relatives non-restrictives (Type 2 — virgules obligatoires, that interdit).

B1 – B2 3 Rules · 3 Exercises · 200-Q Quiz · PDF 3 Règles · 3 Exercices · Quiz 200 Q · PDF 🇬🇧 EN / 🇫🇷 FR

There are two types of relative clause. Type 1 (defining/restrictive) tells you which person or thing is meant. Type 2 (non-defining/extra information) adds extra information about something already identified. The types differ in comma use and in whether that is allowed.

Il existe deux types de proposition relative. Le Type 1 (restrictif) indique quel objet ou personne est visé(e). Le Type 2 (non-restrictif) ajoute des informations sur quelque chose déjà identifié. Les deux types diffèrent dans l'emploi des virgules et dans la possibilité d'utiliser that.

A

Type 1 (Defining) vs Type 2 (Non-defining) — The Core Difference

Type 1 (Restrictif) vs Type 2 (Non-restrictif) — La Différence Fondamentale

Type 1 — Defining (no commas)

Type 1 — Restrictif (sans virgules)

The clause tells you which person/thing.
La relative précise quel(le) personne/chose.
The woman who lives next door is a doctor.
Grace works for a company that makes furniture.
We stayed at the hotel (that) you recommended.
→ No commas. 'that' allowed. Pronoun omittable when object.
→ Pas de virgules. 'that' autorisé. Omissible si objet.

Type 2 — Non-defining (commas required)

Type 2 — Non-restrictif (virgules obligatoires)

The clause gives extra info — the noun is already known.
La relative donne une info supplémentaire — le nom est déjà identifié.
My brother Ben, who lives in Hong Kong, is an architect.
Anna told me about her new job, which she's enjoying a lot.
We stayed at the Park Hotel, which a friend recommended.
→ Commas required. 'that' FORBIDDEN. Pronoun cannot be omitted.
→ Virgules obligatoires. 'that' INTERDIT. Pronom ne peut pas être omis.
⚠️
The meaning can change!Le sens peut changer ! My brother who lives in London is a teacher. (Type 1 → I have more than one brother; this one lives in London)
My brother, who lives in London, is a teacher. (Type 2 → I have one brother; extra info: he lives in London)
My brother who lives in London is a teacher. (Type 1 → J'ai plusieurs frères ; celui-là vit à Londres)
My brother, who lives in London, is a teacher. (Type 2 → J'ai un seul frère ; info extra : il vit à Londres)

B

who / which / that — Different Rules per Type

who / which / that — Règles Différentes selon le Type

FeatureType 1 (Defining)Type 2 (Non-defining) CaractéristiqueType 1 (Restrictif)Type 2 (Non-restrictif)
Commas❌ No commas✅ Commas required
thatthe company that makes furniture❌ NEVER that — ✗ Anna's job, that she enjoys
who / whichwho or that for people; which or that for things✅ Only who for people; only which for things
Omit pronoun?✅ When object: the hotel (that) you recommended❌ NEVER omit: ✗ the Park Hotel, a friend recommended
whomRare (avoid)✅ Possible for object: Chris, whom I hadn't seen for ages
💡
Quick test for Type 2:Test rapide pour le Type 2 : Can you remove the relative clause without losing the identity of the noun? If yes → Type 2 (use commas, no that).
My brother Ben, who lives in Hong Kong, is an architect. → Remove: My brother Ben is an architect. ✓ Still clear → Type 2.
Peut-on supprimer la relative sans perdre l'identité du nom ? Si oui → Type 2 (virgules, pas de that).
Type 1 examples (no commas, that allowed):
Do you know anyone who/that speaks Chinese?
Grace works for a company which/that makes furniture.
We stayed at the hotel (that) you recommended. (object → optional)

Type 2 examples (commas, NO that, pronoun required):
John, who speaks French and Italian, works as a tour guide. (NOT: that speaks)
Anna told me about her new job, which she's enjoying a lot. (NOT: that she's enjoying)
We stayed at the Park Hotel, which a friend recommended. (NOT omittable)
Exemples Type 1 (sans virgules, that autorisé) :
Do you know anyone who/that speaks Chinese?
Grace works for a company which/that makes furniture.
We stayed at the hotel (that) you recommended. (objet → facultatif)

Exemples Type 2 (virgules, PAS de that, pronom obligatoire) :
John, who speaks French and Italian, works as a tour guide. (PAS : that speaks)
Anna told me about her new job, which she's enjoying a lot. (PAS : that she's enjoying)

C

whose and where — Used in Both Types

whose et where — Utilisés dans les Deux Types

Whose and where work in both Type 1 and Type 2 relative clauses. The only difference is the commas.

Whose et where fonctionnent dans les deux types. La seule différence est les virgules.

Type 1 — whose / where

Type 1 — whose / where

We helped some people whose car had broken down.
What's the place where you went on holiday?
I need friends whose values I share.
Do you know a hotel where I can park?

Type 2 — whose / where (+ commas)

Type 2 — whose / where (+ virgules)

Lisa, whose car had broken down, was in a bad mood.
Kate has just been to Sweden, where her daughter lives.
My father, whose health is improving, is coming home soon.
We went to Paris, where we spent three days.

Relative Clauses 4 — ExercisesPropositions Relatives 4 — Exercices

Check your answers instantly

Vérifiez vos réponses instantanément

EX 1

Type 1 or Type 2? Write 1 or 2 for each sentence.

Type 1 ou Type 2 ? Écrivez 1 ou 2 pour chaque phrase.

Type 1 = defining (no commas) · Type 2 = extra information (commas)

Type 1 = restrictive (sans virgules) · Type 2 = information extra (virgules)

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Answers: 1→2 · 2→1 · 3→2 · 4→1 · 5→2 · 6→1 · 7→2 · 8→1
EX 2

Make one sentence using a Type 2 relative clause. Add commas.

Faites une phrase avec une relative de Type 2. Ajoutez les virgules.

Use who / which / whose / where

Utilisez who / which / whose / where

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Answers: 1. who lives next door to us · 2. which a friend of ours recommended · 3. which was not far from the city · 4. whose job involves a lot of travelling · 5. which is the largest state in the US · 6. where her daughter lives
EX 3

Are these sentences correct? Write OK or write the corrected sentence.

Ces phrases sont-elles correctes ? Écrivez OK ou corrigez-les.

Focus on the use of 'that' vs 'which' and comma placement.

Concentrez-vous sur l'emploi de 'that' vs 'which' et les virgules.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Answers: 1. Anna told me about her new job, which she's enjoying very much. · 2. My office, which is on the second floor, is very small. · 3. OK · 4. Sarah's father, who used to be in the army, now works for a TV company. · 5. OK

Frequently Asked Questions

Questions Fréquentes

Why can't I use 'that' in a Type 2 clause?Pourquoi ne peut-on pas utiliser 'that' dans une relative de Type 2 ?

This is a strict rule: that is only allowed in defining (Type 1) clauses. In non-defining (Type 2) clauses, you must use who (for people) or which (for things). ✗ John, that speaks Italian, is a guide. ✓ John, who speaks Italian, is a guide.

Règle stricte : that n'est autorisé que dans les relatives restrictives (Type 1). Dans les non-restrictives, utilisez who ou which.

Can I omit who/which in a Type 2 clause?Peut-on omettre who/which dans une relative de Type 2 ?

No. In Type 2 clauses, who and which can never be omitted. ✗ We stayed at the Park Hotel, a friend recommended. ✓ We stayed at the Park Hotel, which a friend recommended.

Non. Dans les relatives de Type 2, who et which ne peuvent jamais être omis.

Does the meaning change between Type 1 and Type 2?Le sens change-t-il entre Type 1 et Type 2 ?

Yes, often dramatically! Compare:
My sister who lives in Paris is a chef. (Type 1 → I have more than one sister; this one lives in Paris.)
My sister, who lives in Paris, is a chef. (Type 2 → I have one sister; extra info: she lives in Paris.)

Oui, souvent de façon significative ! Les virgules signalent que le nom est déjà identifié.

Can I use 'whom' in a Type 2 clause?Peut-on utiliser 'whom' dans une relative de Type 2 ?

Yes! ✓ This morning I met Chris, whom I hadn't seen for ages. 'Whom' is more common in Type 2 than in Type 1.

Oui ! ✓ This morning I met Chris, whom I hadn't seen for ages.

🎯 Unit 95 · MCQ QuizUnité 95 · Quiz QCM

Relative Clauses 4 — Quiz

Propositions Relatives 4 — Quiz

200-question bank · 10–40 questions per session · instant feedback

Banque de 200 questions · 10 à 40 questions · correction immédiate

200 QuestionsB1 · B2PDF ✓

⚙️ Quiz SettingsParamètres du Quiz

Relative Clauses 4 Quiz

20 questions

out of 20 questions
Correct
Wrong
Skipped

PrepMyEnglish™

Learn and speak better English

Apprenez et parlez un meilleur anglais